Nashville Elite Fencing Club - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DONG Joshua | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 37% | 7% |
| 2 | JOHNSON Soren | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 3 | MOORE Alexander | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 3 | JONES Gideon | 1% | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 5 | FERRER Kenyn | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 10% | |
| 6 | KARLEKAR Veer | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 8 | QUEENER, IV Henry | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 9 | KNICK Canyon | - | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 35% | 15% |
| 10 | CHAMBERS Benjamin | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 11 | DONOVAN AVERY | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 12 | TEITENBERG Elise | 23% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 13 | DAS Kushal | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 14 | CHAPPELL Lydia | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 15 | DING Albert | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 16 | HAUBENREICH Abigail | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 17 | KENNEDY Charles | 1% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 18 | PORTER Cora | 2% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | |
| 19 | HALVERSON Spencer | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 20 | SCHWARTZ Sophie | 2% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | GOCHBERG Madeline | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | DREWRY Alexandra | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 23 | DUBEY Neel | 5% | 29% | 44% | 21% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | HWANG Jungho | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 25 | SHOFNER Eliora | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 26 | GAMBILL ayden | 11% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | ADAMS Elvis | < 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.