Chaminade High School - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAI Sy | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 2 | TOUSSAINT Wizard | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
| 3 | WONG Alexander | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 53% | 7% | |
| 3 | ONG David | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 5 | YUN Nicholas | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
| 6 | PARK Sihoon | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
| 7 | KOU Mason | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 8 | FEKETE John | 65% | 30% | 4% | - | < 1% | - | |
| 9 | YUN Mason | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 10 | MITCHELL Kallum | - | - | 3% | 28% | 47% | 22% | |
| 11 | MAI Khai | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% | |
| 12 | FERRIERE Theo | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% | |
| 13 | TAN Yichen | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 14 | TIAN Dylan | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | RUTSTEIN Isaac | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
| 16 | GONG Rongtao | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | HAILU Noah | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 18 | BIDDLE Alexander | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | |
| 19 | SANTOS William | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 25% | 1% | |
| 20 | HUANG Eason | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | MCEWEN Max | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | ORWITZ Mattis | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 23 | ZANDPOUR Wesley | 11% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | MAAS James | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | SAMUELSON Ben | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | RANA Hridayrajsinh | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 27 | CHEN Alexander | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
| 28 | RANA Harshvardhansinh | 1% | 35% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | MULDER Chasen | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | HALL Elvis | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 31 | OVERACKER Ryker | 1% | 13% | 39% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | SCHOELLHAMMER John | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | ELLIOTT Sage | 21% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | BROWN Adam | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 35 | URBAND Ethan | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 36 | HORN Shane | < 1% | 10% | 44% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 37 | HAO TIANQI | < 1% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 38 | LEMME Theo | < 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.