Maplewood, NJ - Maplewood, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MAKLIN Edward P. | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 2 | GREENE Alexander J. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 3 | CHAN Matthew | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 3 | LEE Justin | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 5 | SKINNER Graham B. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 6 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 7 | HUANG Ethan F. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 8 | ZHENG Edward L. | V D D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 9 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 10 | PENG Bryan | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 11 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | MORRILL Justin | D D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 13 | DENG Andrew | V D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 14 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | D V V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 15 | SULLIVAN Aidan J. | D D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 16 | FIELDS Matthew S. | D V D D D | V V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 17 | TASIKAS Stylianos | V V V V D V | D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 18 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | V V V D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 19 | LEMPERT Adam | V V D D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 20 | ZHUANG Rayken | D V V D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 21 | KIM Matthew | V D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 22 | ZENG Noah | D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 23 | WU Wilmund | D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 24 | LEUNG Andrew K. | D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 25 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | D D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 26 | MARGULIES William | V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 27 | RUIGOMEZ Eduardo | D V V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 28 | OH Triton | D D V D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 29 | ZHU Shao | D V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 30 | SMITH Vaughn | V D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 31 | SMINK Oliver | D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 32 | LIN Stephen | D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 33 | BELLUCCI Nicholas | V D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 34 | YOUNG Sebastian G. | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 35 | DOLAN Charles R. | D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 36 | DAI William | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 37 | GILPIN Samuel | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.