Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | EPPLY-SCHMIDT Paul | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% |
| 2 | DEW Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 3 | DOURAGHY Jamie M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 3 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
| 5 | DIAZ Julio P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 17% |
| 6 | VOYIAZIAKIS Emanuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 12% |
| 7 | DELL George H. | 100% | 94% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 8 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 7% | |
| 9 | DENMAN Matthew L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 10 | POWERS Douglas A. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 11 | CHERNOMASHENTSEV Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | 10% |
| 12 | WILBERT Matt | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 13 | WHARTON David | 100% | 91% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 14 | JONES Sam J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 26% | 4% |
| 15 | TREANOR Donald K. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | LYNDERS William | 100% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 17 | OLIVARES Fretz G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 20% |
| 18 | BALESTRACCI CHRIS | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 5% |
| 19 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 6% |
| 20 | PAVLOVICH Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% |
| 21 | ZEISS Gary M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 37% | 6% | - | - |
| 22 | BERGER Jamie | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | DONE Harris | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | 1% | |
| 24 | JOHANSON David B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | LIM Richard M. | 100% | 94% | 57% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 27 | SVIHL Dale | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 28 | LESNIAK Chuck | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 29 | WEMPLE Charles | 100% | 72% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 30 | KAROLAK Dale W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 31 | ZAIDI Sohail | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | DOVER Felix | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | JEFFCOAT Timothy | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | GIRALDO Elias | 100% | 32% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.