Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MARX Leslie M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 56% | |
| 2 | FOELLMER Kristin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
| 3 | MARSH Janet L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 31% | |
| 3 | EXUM Monica M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | |
| 5 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
| 6 | CHANG Heidi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
| 7 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 8 | SHICK Klaudia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
| 9 | BOWDEN nancy | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | BAGAMANOVA Maria | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 11 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
| 12 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 22% | |
| 13 | CHIMIENTI Michele | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 14 | DURRELL Katherine (Kathy) J. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
| 15 | LLOYD Melanie | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 16 | MUELLER Polo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 5% | |
| 17 | GANSER Yuliya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 18 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 4% | |
| 19 | BRISK Angelica A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 17% | 1% | |
| 20 | CHERNIS Sabina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 21 | PAINE Cheryl A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% | 2% | |
| 22 | CAREY Michele S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 7% | |
| 23 | SWENSON Alexandra | 100% | 97% | 73% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | BLASKO Judit | 100% | 80% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | STANICA Teodora O. | 100% | 99% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | LAPP Laurie E. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
| 27 | KUHN April | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | BOWEN Victoria M. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | SETO Karen | 100% | 77% | 27% | 3% | - | - | |
| 30 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 31 | ONTIVEROS Sara D. | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | HUTCHINSON Valerie A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 3% |
| 33 | PARKER Jacquie D. | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | KELLY Diane A. | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | DAVIS Shanna | 100% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | LONG OKURA Rebecca | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | MAYCHROWITZ Laura M. | 100% | 3% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.