Maplewood, NJ - Maplewood, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% | |
| 2 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 3 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 3 | PERLMAN Talia | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 39% | 8% | |
| 5 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 6 | WONG Sophia M. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% |
| 7 | BASSON Bayley D. | 2% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 8 | SULTANA-HOLE Olivia B. | 10% | 44% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 9 | LI Meilin | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 10 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 2% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 11 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 7% |
| 12 | ROY Layla | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 8% | |
| 13 | MI Anning | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 14 | WU Celine | - | 6% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 3% | |
| 15 | FURST Chloe | 3% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 16 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | FELDMAN Talia | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% | |
| 18 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 4% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 19 | JONES Jenna | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 20 | FELLUS Talia E. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 14% | 1% | |
| 21 | SUNG Yoomin | 33% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 22 | ENG Alexy P. | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.