Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 2 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 3 | ASHER Valerie | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 3 | CANO-DIOSA Rosa M. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 79% |
| 5 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 6 | FABRY Lydia L. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 7 | TOLLEY Toby | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 8 | ROWLAND May | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 9 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 10 | BLOOMER Suzanne | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 29% | 3% |
| 11 | SCHMID Carola K. | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | - |
| 12 | TASKER Monisha B. | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 13 | CHRISTIAN Lyn T. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 14 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 15 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 16 | WHEELER Michele L. | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | FINNEGAN Ellen M. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | RICH Caroline B. | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 19 | SMITH Dorothy | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 20 | AMELI Cynthia | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | LOVE Georgina | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 22 | MASE Kerin | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | WIESSLER-HUGHES Linda | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | ORCUTT Teresa R. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 25 | ZEHE Michele A. | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 26 | BRUNELLI Alessandra | 26% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 11% | 47% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | LEIGHTON Louise N. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 29 | SIMON Sally R. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 30 | TRELOAR Allison F. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | COMES Rita | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | HERRICK Kerry K. | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 33 | TAYLOR Francine M. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 34 | JENSEN MJ | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 35 | TUCKER Ellen | 65% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.