February NAC

Div I Women's Foil

Thursday, February 12, 2026 at 2:00 PM

Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 KIEFER Lee O. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.9 6 +0.1
2 CALISE Ella V V V V V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
3 LUNG Katerina V V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
3 STUTCHBURY Carolina J. D V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 5 -0.6
5 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
6 WANG YIRAN V V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
7 CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. V V V V D V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
8 CHO Rebecca H. V V V V D D V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
9 LIU Jaelyn A. V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
10 SHEN Emilia V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
11 SUN Chloe V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
12 WEINTRAUB Maia M. V D V V V V V V D 5.9 5 -0.9
13 RHODES Zander V D V V V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
14 JANG Kimberley V V V D V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
15 YANG Emma V D V D V V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
16 ZOU Ella D V D V V V V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
17 KONG Chin-Yi V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
18 FEDELI Caterina S. V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
19 SEO IRENE Y. V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
19 WANG YiXi V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
21 EYER Hailey M. V V V D V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
22 CHUN Adelle Ha-Eune V V D V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
23 GOOR Viviene E. V V D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
24 TANG Melody Fujiao D V V V V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
25 GRIFFIN Emma G. V V D V V D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
25 DENG Melissa D V D V V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
27 CHEN Renee V V D D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
28 HO Addison V V D D V V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
29 PEVZNER Victoria D D V V V V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
30 HUNG Juliana K. D D V V D D V V D 4.4 2 -2.4
31 FENG Audrey D V D D D V V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
32 EYER Brooke V D V D D D V V D 1.0 2 +1.0
33 LI Han (Helina) V V D V V V D 2.3 5 +2.7
34 XUE Alanna L. V V V V D V D 4.2 5 +0.8
35 LIN Zhi Tong V V V V D V D 3.9 5 +1.1
36 YANG Iris V V V V V D D 4.1 5 +0.9
37 LEE Lavender V V V D V D 4.0 4 -
38 ZHANG Soleil C. V V V V D D 2.8 4 +1.2
39 CHO Emily (Euran) V V D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
40 KIM Claire D V V V V D 1.2 4 +2.8
41 FENG Grace V V V D V D D 3.0 4 +1.0
42 GU Maggie Runlin V D D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
43 NISSINOFF Alexandra D D V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
44 TAKAMIZAWA Yukari V V V D D V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
45 LIU Joy Zhaoyi V V V D D V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
46 KIM Sydney V D V D V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
47 LEUNG Mei Hang (Danise) V V D V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
48 DIMATULAC Elise Ann V D V V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
49 PEVZNER Nicole V D V V D V D 1.5 3 +1.5
50 WANG Amabel D D V V V V D 1.1 3 +1.9
51 DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia D V D V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
52 ZHANG Ivy D D V D V V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
53 MI Aileen V D V D V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
54 SERBAN Samantha M. V D D V D V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
55 SAKALLA Serene D D D V V V V D 0.9 3 +2.1
56 PALMER Meredith K. D V D D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
57 WANG DINA C. D V D V D V V D 1.2 3 +1.8
58 ANDREYENKA Hanna D V D V D V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
59 ZHAO Sophie L. D D V V D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
60 ORVANANOS Anice V D D D V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
61 YANG Audrey V V D D D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
62 ANDREYENKA Yana D V D D D V V D 4.7 2 -2.7
63 FETECAU Ilinca V D D D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
64 LAI Sophia D D V D V D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
65 HARRIS Julia V D V V V D D 2.0 4 +2.0
66 HSU Kaylin V D V V V D D 2.8 4 +1.2
67 HAYES Nadia D V V V V D D 4.9 4 -0.9
68 LEE Alina V V V D D D 4.4 3 -1.4
69 KIM Hyeonwon Stella V D D V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
70 LIU Angel(Daying) V V D D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
71 MCSHERRY Ava D D V V V D 3.0 3 -
72 TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite D D D V V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
73 BROWN Lola D D V V V D D 1.7 3 +1.3
74 XIE Lillian D V V D V D D 1.5 3 +1.5
75 KIM Rachel V V V D D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
76 JOO Natalie D V D V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
77 LIU Samantha D V D D V V D 1.8 3 +1.2
78 LIU Enjia Sherry liu V D D V D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
79 WANG SIQI D V D D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
80 WU Nicole M. D V D V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
81 KORABLINA Aleksandra V D V D D D 4.2 2 -2.2
81 WANG CAROL D V V D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
83 DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) V D D V D D 2.0 2 -
84 CHEN Chloe I. V D V D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
85 MORADI Raiyan N. D V D D V D 2.0 2 -
86 KLINE Melissa C. V V D D D D D 4.3 2 -2.3
87 ROZPEDOWSKI Claire V D D V D D D 3.0 2 -1.0
88 KOKES Aurora D D V D V D D 4.3 2 -2.3
89 AADHI Hansika V V D D D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
90 SONG Yuqiao Aprille V D D D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
91 KRAHE Annika D V D V D D D 1.0 2 +1.0
92 ESTEBAN Maxine Isabel D V D V D D D 4.6 2 -2.6
93 MCSHERRY Kayla D V D D D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
94 MANCINI Ludovica D V V D D D D 4.5 2 -2.5
95 SHENG Katherine D V D V D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
96 YURKOVA Mariia D D D V D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
97 PUTHOFF Olivia D D V D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
98 NAMGALAURI Mariam D D V D D D 3.1 1 -2.1
99 ZHOU Joi D V D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
100 SUN Emily D D D D V 2.0 1 -1.0
101 COOPER Piper W. D D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
102 WATSON Evelyn D D V D D 1.0 1 -
103 ORBE-AUSTIN Nia D D V D D 0.6 1 +0.4
104 STRUGAR Steliana D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
105 CULLIVAN Sienna D D D D V 1.3 1 -0.3
106 HU Jenna V D D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
107 LI Joy D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
108 RENTON Samantha D D D V D D 2.4 1 -1.4
109 OH Ceana D D D V D D 2.4 1 -1.4
110 SHMUKLER Maria D D D D D V 1.1 1 -0.1
110 MATOS MENA Deyanara D D D D V D 1.0 1 -
112 WYNN Kylie D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
113 FIELD Elizabeth D D V D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
114 OWENS Elise D V D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
115 SHICK Veronika D D D V D D 0.5 1 +0.5
116 BING Charlotte D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
117 HARRIS Parker D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
118 CHEN Jia P. D D D D D 3.6 0 -3.6
119 SHIM Grace J. D D D D D D 2.7 0 -2.7
120 KAPRAN Anastasia D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
121 LI Savannah D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
122 YU Jane D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
123 WANG Joanna D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
124 WU Chingfei Amber D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
125 QUINN Anna D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.