Event Results
February NACDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHO Inga | V V V V | V V V | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 2 | KANESHIGE Christina Y. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | PIERRYNOWSKI Kathryn S. | V V V D D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 3 | MCGRATH Polina S. | D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 5 | SETHRE Traci | V V V D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 6 | CHUANG Jocelyn | V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 7 | LIPPAI Sarah | D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 8 | LAU-ALLEN Macy | D D D D V | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 9 | FEDDE Rachel A. | D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 10 | OU Sochivly | V D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 11 | SAVOSTIANOVA Elena | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |