Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BINIAK Lacey | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% | |
| 2 | BATES Cassandra L. | - | - | - | - | - | 18% | 82% |
| 3 | PHAIR Meghan D. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 3 | HANSEN Kira | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 5 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 66% | 12% |
| 6 | FOELLMER Kristin | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 7 | MARCOTTE Anna K. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 8 | LAWSON Marie A. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 9 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 10 | POLANICHKA Nicole | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 11 | MARX Leslie M. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 46% | 40% |
| 11 | EXUM Monica M. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 49% | 29% |
| 11 | CHANG Heidi | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 51% | 10% |
| 14 | ASHER Valerie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
| 15 | HABERKERN Kundry E. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 16 | BLOOMER Suzanne | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 17 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 2% |
| 18 | CANO-DIOSA Rosa M. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 25% | 73% |
| 19 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% |
| 20 | BAGAMANOVA Maria | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 21 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 22 | CHIMIENTI Michele | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
| 23 | CHRISTIAN Lyn T. | - | 8% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 24 | BOWDEN nancy | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 25 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 26 | DUNSEATH Lauren M. | - | 4% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 4% | |
| 27 | SIMON Sally R. | 13% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | BYRON Karen J. | 3% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 29 | SCHMID Carola K. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 30 | ZEHE Michele A. | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 32 | LEIGHTON Louise N. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 33 | NEISINGH Elena | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 34 | PAINE Cheryl A. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | SHICK Klaudia | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | BOWIE Charlotta | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 37 | LAPP Laurie E. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | JORGENSEN Rebekah | 17% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | ONTIVEROS Sara D. | 20% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | HUTCHINSON Valerie A. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 33% | 4% |
| 41 | GANSER Yuliya | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% |
| 42 | TOLLEY Toby | - | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 22% | 2% |
| 43 | JENSEN MJ | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 44 | BLASKO Judit | 5% | 35% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | WIESSLER-HUGHES Linda | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 46 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 47 | LLOYD Melanie | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | CAREY Michele S. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 49 | HOEHLE Stacy A. | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | REED Juliya | 55% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | MORET Brighid E. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 52 | LONG OKURA Rebecca | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | BRISK Angelica A. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 54 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 55 | RICH Caroline B. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 56 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 15% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | DURRELL Katherine (Kathy) J. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 58 | MARSH Janet L. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 41% | 11% | |
| 59 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 60 | WHEELER Michele L. | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | SETO Karen | 7% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | FINNEGAN Ellen M. | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 63 | AMIRAULT Amy | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 64 | KELLY Diane A. | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 65 | JULIEN Erica | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | HAMMONDS Carissa | 12% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | WUNDERLICH Cara J. | - | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 68 | BRODEUR Andrea | 11% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 69 | HEWITT Lisa M. | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 70 | DAVIS Shanna | 34% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 71 | BOWEN Victoria M. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 72 | COMES Rita | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 73 | KUHN April | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 74 | SWENSON Alexandra | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 75 | BROWN Trish M. | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | ROWLAND May | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 77 | ORCUTT Teresa R. | < 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 78 | TAYLOR Francine M. | 21% | 52% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 79 | REAM Jann L. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 80 | TOBY Charmaine | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 81 | GRIFFIN Martha A. | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 82 | TUCKER Ellen | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.