Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% |
| 2 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 3 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 58% |
| 3 | SHEN Emilia | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
| 5 | TANG Melody Fujiao | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 6 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 33% | |
| 7 | YANG Emma | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 8 | GU Maggie Runlin | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 37% | 4% |
| 9 | YANG Iris | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 10 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 11 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 12 | OH Ceana | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% | 1% |
| 13 | HAYES Nadia | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 14 | ZOU Ella | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 15 | HSU Kaylin | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 16 | LI Han (Helina) | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 46% | 23% |
| 18 | CALISE Ella | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
| 19 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 45% | 32% |
| 20 | DENG Melissa | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 42% | 10% |
| 21 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 57% |
| 22 | FENG Grace | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 23 | LAI Sophia | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% | |
| 24 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% | |
| 25 | MI Aileen | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 26 | ZHOU Chenchu | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | YANG Audrey | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 6% |
| 28 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 29 | MCSHERRY Kayla | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | FETECAU Ilinca | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 47% | 17% |
| 32 | SUN Emily | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | - | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | JANG Kimberley | - | - | 3% | 19% | 48% | 31% | |
| 35 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 45% | 12% |
| 36 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 2% |
| 37 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 51% |
| 38 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 39 | LIU Enjia Sherry liu | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | ZHANG Soleil C. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 11% |
| 41 | KIM Claire | 1% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 42 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | |
| 43 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 44 | ZHANG Ivy | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 46 | FENG Audrey | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 47 | WANG YIRAN | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% |
| 48 | WANG CAROL | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 49 | WANG Joanna | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 50 | WYNN Kylie | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | EYER Brooke | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | LI Sophia M. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
| 53 | WANG SIQI | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 54 | HO Addison | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 55 | LEUNG Mei Hang (Danise) | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 56 | CHUN Adelle Ha-Eune | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% | |
| 57 | MU Allison | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 58 | WANG YiXi | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
| 59 | KIM Sydney | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 60 | JOO Natalie | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 61 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | < 1% | 6% | 34% | 60% |
| 62 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 63 | KIM Rachel | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 64 | LIU Ariana | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 65 | CHEN Renee | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 10% | |
| 65 | SUN Chloe | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 40% | |
| 67 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% | 1% |
| 68 | PUTHOFF Olivia | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 69 | WANG DINA C. | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 70 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 71 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 72 | COOPER Piper W. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 73 | DUAN Sophie | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 74 | SHIM Grace J. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 75 | WANG Amabel | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 76 | CHOI Jion | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 77 | BROWN Lola | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 78 | XIE Su | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 79 | SWANSON Alexa | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 80 | SAKALLA Serene | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 81 | LEE Fiona E. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 82 | LIN Zhi Tong | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 83 | WATSON Evelyn | 9% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 84 | BING Charlotte | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 85 | BERGEL Daphne | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 86 | FIELD Elizabeth | 5% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 87 | WU Nicole M. | 5% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 88 | XIE Lillian | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
| 89 | YURKOVA Mariia | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 90 | SHENG Chuxi | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 91 | LIU Samantha | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 92 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 92 | GUAN Adeline | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 94 | HU Jenna | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 95 | HOROWITZ Shuli | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 96 | REN Kayley | 1% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 96 | LI Joy | 11% | 50% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 99 | LEVY Avery | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 99 | ZHOU Joi | 2% | 21% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 101 | LUO Miranda | 13% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 102 | HARRIS Parker | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 103 | SHENG Katherine | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 104 | STRUGAR Steliana | 7% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 105 | HARRIS Julia | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 106 | KOPYLTSOVA Elizaveta | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 107 | LI Christina | 9% | 43% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 108 | QUINN Anna | 10% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 109 | CANNON Lira J. | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 109 | LENK Sophie | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 109 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 112 | KAPRAN Anastasia | 1% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 113 | OWENS Elise | 3% | 35% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 114 | YU Jane | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 115 | SHMUKLER Maria | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 116 | WU Chingfei Amber | 7% | 40% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 117 | FECHER Lily | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 118 | CHOI JULIE | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 119 | SWOPE Farren | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 120 | LI Savannah | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 120 | XIONG Isabel | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 122 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 123 | SFINTESCU Emma | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 124 | KRAHE Annika | 28% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 125 | BOIKE Lucille | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 126 | CULLIVAN Sienna | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 127 | BLAKEY Heaven | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 127 | AADHI Hansika | 3% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 127 | ZHANG Tianyi | 69% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 130 | LEGGETT Emilia | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 131 | SHICK Veronika | 42% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 132 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 133 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.