Event Results
IUP After Valentines DuelDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TARCHICHI Robby | V V V V | V V V | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 2 | OPFERMAN Michael J. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 3 | FRIEDMAN Andres | V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 3 | SODOWSKY Thomas | V V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 5 | GANZY Ethan | V V D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 6 | COYLE Emma | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 7 | TAYLOR Jr Daniel (Dan) L. | D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 8 | KNIGHT Nicholas | D D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 9 | RICHARDS Johnny | D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 10 | CRAMER Lily | D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 11 | RICHARDS Daniel | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |