Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | - | 6% | 39% | 54% | |
| 2 | PIERRYNOWSKI Kathryn S. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
| 3 | FOLEY Eileen | - | - | 3% | 23% | 53% | 21% | |
| 3 | KOSZYK Agnieszka | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 5 | KALKINA Yelena | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% | |
| 6 | ALTMAN Leigh | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 7 | ENOCHS Liz | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 13% |
| 8 | LIM Nona | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 9 | MARTINEZ ELIZALDE Giselle | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 10 | GLUCK Myriam | - | 3% | 20% | 51% | 23% | 3% | |
| 11 | WILLEMSE Jamie | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 12 | VANCE Beth S. | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | |
| 13 | DEMING Clare L. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% |
| 14 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | |
| 15 | EARLS Elizabeth A. | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | KING Robin E. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | ZHAO Jing | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 18 | MINDIRGASOVA Valentina | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 19 | YU Michelle | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 20 | FREYRE Rebecca R. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 21 | CAISSE Michelle | 11% | 43% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 23 | FEITLER Sarah | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 24 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
| 25 | WEBB Maud | 16% | 43% | 34% | 7% | - | - | |
| 26 | DEGEN Anita L. | 9% | 41% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | DEWSNUP Kelly | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 24% | |
| 28 | BENDER Jeannine M. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 28 | YOON Mi | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | DAHL Naomi V. | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | DUONG Esther | 10% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | VINOGOROVA Daria | 13% | 45% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | HIRSCH Lauren | 25% | 46% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 34 | BORN Grace | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 35 | SUZUKI HAN Alisa | 57% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 36 | SETHRE Traci | 2% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | STARKS-FAULKNER Jennette | - | 2% | 11% | 36% | 43% | 9% | |
| 38 | LUM Karen | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 39 | ROWLAND May | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 42 | PEIN Annette | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | ZHANG Yan | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | CURRIER Kristy | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 45 | MASLEN Cheryl L. | 21% | 45% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.