USC Physical Education Building - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YUE Jackson | V V V V | V V V V V | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 2 | LAI Christopher W. | V V D V | V V V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 3 | POON Simon | V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 5 | XIAO Edward | V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 5 | VILLARAMA Kara | V V V V | V V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 7 | LIN Xilong | V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 8 | LI Daniel | V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 9 | MASHEVSKY Michael M. | V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 10 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 11 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 12 | CHEN Cynthia | V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 13 | MEDVIDOVIC Pavle | V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 14 | LAMBRECHT Julius | V V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 15 | HUANG Nathan | V V D V | V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 16 | LEE Christopher | D V V V | V V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 17 | LIGHTFOOT Devin | V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 18 | LI Serena | V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 19 | LEE Ka Ying Susanna | D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 20 | LIN Lydia J. | V D V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 21 | BECKER Ethan | D V V V | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 22 | LEE Sean | V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | DACKO Nolan | V V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 24 | DENG David | V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 25 | YE Jerry | V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 26 | TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin | D D V V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 27 | CHOY Benedict W. | D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 27 | SHADRAVAN Arash | D V V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 29 | LEE Lucas | V V D D | V D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 30 | VARIDIREDDY Suhan | D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | KUZMAK Michael J. | D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 32 | LOPES-EASON Liam James | V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 33 | WELBORN Calissa | V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 34 | YUNG Brandon | V D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 35 | CHEN Thomas | V V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 36 | PATTERSON Natalia | D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 37 | KUSUMANEGARA Kallista | D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 38 | GAO Yifei (Nancy) | D D D V | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 39 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 40 | WALBERT Charlotte B. | D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 41 | GROSSMAN Scott A. | D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 42 | KOEHLER Marc | V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 43 | YU Stanley | D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 44 | WANG Lawrence | V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 45 | HERNANDEZ PAREDES Aldo | D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 46 | COLE-WOOD Madison | D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 46 | DAVID Rachel Arianna | D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 48 | NGUYEN Bruce | D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 49 | PROPHETE Jasmin S. | D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 50 | WEN James | D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 50 | CHUNG Joshua | D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 50 | GARCIA Ezahir | D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 53 | SUN Rose | D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 53 | WU Justin | D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 55 | GELLER Elias-Michael | D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.