USC Physical Education Building - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V V V | V V V V V V | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 2 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | V V D V | V V V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 3 | SMITH Justin C. | V V V V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 3 | RUSSO Angelo | V V V D | V V V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 5 | SHUR Yakov C. | V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 5 | WICKBOLDT Eric | V V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 7 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | V V D V | V V V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 8 | JONES Caleb | V D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 9 | CHIEN Brandon | V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 10 | HAN Jiyoon | V D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 11 | NIXON Mark | V V D V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 12 | SANKEY Luka | V V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 13 | GADHVI Darius | V D V V | V V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 14 | SAHAGIAN Izzy C. | V V D D | V V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 15 | KNIGHT Alex | D D V V | V V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 16 | XU Che | D D D V | V V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 17 | BAXTER David | V V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 18 | JUNG WonJoon | V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 19 | LEE Royce | V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 20 | POON Simon | D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 21 | DENISON Declan | V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 22 | MAI Mailan | V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 23 | KIM Vivian | V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 24 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 24 | ZHU Zimo | V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 26 | LIN Ryan | V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 27 | FERRIERE Joshua | D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 28 | LIPTON Jason S. | V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 29 | BERTEL Florian | D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 30 | MAI Sy | D D V V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 31 | MAXU Tiger | D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | KELLOGG Ethan | V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 33 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | V D V V | D | 0.6 | 3 | +2.4 |
| 34 | KAHR Edward L. | V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 35 | HILLSTROM Nathan | D V D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 36 | WOO Jonathan | D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 37 | SHETTY Rohit | V D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 38 | WANG Dylan | D V V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 39 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | V D D V | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 40 | CHAO Warren | D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 41 | DINGMAN Nash | V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 42 | SOKOLOVSKY Boris | D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 43 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 44 | SHAHRIL Natalia | D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 45 | GURROLA Michal | D D V D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 46 | GULLY Wren | V D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 46 | TOUSSAINT Wizard | V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 48 | LU eric | V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 49 | KIM Remington | D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 49 | WANG Lawrence | D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 51 | GRAFF Adam | D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 52 | YUN Nicholas | D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 53 | FERRIERE Thomas | D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 54 | KOU Mason | D D D V | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 55 | CIOBANU Celine | D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 56 | NOH Daniel | D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 57 | MISRA Tara | D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 58 | YE Terry | D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 59 | FISCHMAN Eve | D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 59 | MARDANIAN Alice | D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.