Salle Auriol Seattle - Seattle, WA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PIISPANEN Eric A. | - | - | - | - | - | 7% | 93% |
| 2 | KALISOVA Kristyna | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 3 | YANG Caroline | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 3 | WANG Tina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 5 | MOULTON Andrew | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | - |
| 6 | VALENTINE Rhys | 1% | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 7 | LOPER Alex | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 46% | 3% | |
| 8 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% |
| 9 | VACCA Giovanni | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 10 | RICH Augustus (Gus) G. | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% | |
| 11 | MOODY Paul J. | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | |
| 12 | SIT Jayden Ka-Hin | 3% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 13 | RAMAN Indira | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | RASHELL Simon | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 1% |
| 15 | MITCHELL-LU Hiro | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | HOLMES Xavier | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 17 | LARA Alfred | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 29% |
| 18 | NEARMAN Christopher | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | CARLUCCI Laura A. | - | - | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
| 20 | ASHTIANI Shaya | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 21 | MA Yanjie | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 22 | SAKPAL Raghavi | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 23 | XU David | - | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | KING Robin E. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 2% | |
| 25 | BECK Mica | 1% | 14% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 26 | BARCZAY Sara E. | 4% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | DAVISSON Zack | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | TING Alexander | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | MUSSER Westin | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 30 | HE Manni | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 31 | JI Xinya | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | HO Ethan | 9% | 42% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | SIVORAPHONH Ryan H. | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | - |
| 34 | WILCOX Kellen | 13% | 45% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | MEDANICH Frederick | - | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 36 | WONG Lucia | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | WONG Alice | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | WALCH Ryan | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | DEGEN Anita L. | 16% | 46% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | GUEA Mark | 85% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.