Georgia Square Mall - Athens, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WEISSMAN Kai | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 2 | PAYNE Gareth | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | DUPREE Thomas | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 3 | ARZT Nicholas | D V D V D V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 5 | ELLIOTT Wyatt | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 6 | HICKS Matthew | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 7 | THOMPSON Daniel | V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 8 | EDGECOMB Michael | D V D V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 9 | KNOX Aidan | V V V V D V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 10 | KWON Jason | V V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 11 | LOUDON Luke | V D V V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 12 | WRIGHT Alex | V V V D D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 13 | COLLINS Andrew | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 14 | FORD Tillman | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 15 | KRIEGER Jack | D V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 16 | HEATON Andrew | D D D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 18 | MARSHALL Wesley | V V D V V V | D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 19 | RICKMAN Ian | V V V V D | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 20 | MEILAN William | V D V V V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 21 | KIKER Josiah | D V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 22 | MEIER Nicholas | V V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 23 | PUFFENBERGER Daniel | V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 24 | FARFOUR William | V D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 25 | CALINSKY Edward | V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | OLENDER Lexi | V D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 27 | WILSON Andrew | D V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 28 | ZIELINSKI Alexander | D D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 29 | HICKS Joseph | D V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 30 | CHAPPELL Wesley | D D V D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 31 | PHILLIPS Carson | D V D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 32 | TAURMAN Patrick | V D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 33 | FERRARO Nicholas | D V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 34 | MANN Justin | D V D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 35 | HUNTER James | D D V V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 36 | GELSTHORPE Kevin | V D D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 37 | MARSTON Isaac | V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 38 | GEISSLER Maximilian | D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 39 | HAAS Lindsey | V D D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 40 | GUNDUBOGULA Shrihan | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 41 | KUNCHAKURI Ritvik | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 42 | PEACOCK Audrey | D V D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 43 | MENON Rahul | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 44 | SIGG Noah | D D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 45 | BASU Avik | V D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 46 | HANNER Robert | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 47 | SIGGINS Wally | D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 48 | KINSELLA John | V D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 49 | WASH James | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 49 | DURYEE Alex | D D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 51 | LOWE Michael | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 52 | HERNDON Rylee | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.