University of Texas at Dallas - Richardson, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WEST Abraham | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 2 | WOODALL Ian L. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 3 | BUI Ethan | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 3 | WILSON Bryan | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 5 | HUDSON Arav | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 6 | ORDUNO Edgar | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 23% | 3% |
| 7 | CHEN Kevin | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% | |
| 8 | SENISCH Isaac | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 9 | WARMERDAM Joseph | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 10 | HOLLINS Noah | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% |
| 11 | SCHMIDT Robert | 8% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 12 | MORRISON Everett | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 13 | ETIKALA Saanvi | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 14 | VEULEMAN Cayden | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 15 | FU Tianshu | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 16 | GREENAWAY Stuart | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | THOMPSON Joshua | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 19 | SMITH Autumn | - | - | 3% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% |
| 20 | KONG Raymond | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 21 | RO Allison | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 22 | ASHLEY Edmond | - | 16% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 23 | FARRIS Makenna | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 24 | SMITH Matthew | - | 5% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 25 | WANG Borui | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | VASHISHTH Adi | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 27 | NGUYEN Bao | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | EUBANKS christopher | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | LEMUS Anthony | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
| 30 | GUTIERREZ Raymond | - | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% | |
| 31 | BATTLE Persephone | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 32 | RODRIGUEZ Jadan | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | SHAKIROVA Renata | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | AVENDANO Eladia | 2% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 35 | MUNOZ Samantha | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | PHILLIPS Audrey | 35% | 50% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | TIOTUICO Joel | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | TRAN Catherine | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | HAUGHT Megan | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | WEST Sylvia | 4% | 32% | 43% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | MACHADO Nik | 3% | 27% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | ESPARZA Cullen | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.