Davis Fencing Academu - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MIETTINEN Pyry | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% |
| 2 | BHANOT Arjun | - | - | 5% | 33% | 53% | 8% | |
| 3 | UZGIRIS Kovas | - | - | - | 1% | 21% | 77% | |
| 3 | BURAGOHAIN Aiden | - | - | 2% | 18% | 48% | 28% | 4% |
| 5 | LO Ernest | - | - | 4% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% |
| 6 | DOUGLASS Liam | - | - | 1% | 13% | 40% | 39% | 6% |
| 7 | AHN Theodore | - | 2% | 17% | 53% | 26% | 2% | |
| 8 | WENDLER Lauren | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 45% | 15% |
| 9 | OH Isaiah | 9% | 40% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 10 | PEGRAM Rafferty | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 11 | RAMIREZ Jordan | 1% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 12 | BHATT Jay | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% |
| 13 | HAMEL Gillian | 15% | 49% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 14 | MAZZA Daniel | - | 3% | 20% | 43% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 15 | SANDOVAL Cedric | 10% | 39% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | HINTZ Rayan | 2% | 17% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 17 | ROSEN Jesse | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
| 18 | KULKARNI Myra | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | - | - |
| 19 | HELOU Marc | 28% | 48% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 20 | HONG Elliot | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 21 | MONOLAKIS Steven | - | 2% | 18% | 44% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 22 | JAIN Akshat | 4% | 26% | 45% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | BUTZ Beau | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 41% | 8% |
| 25 | DOBBINS Mateo | 27% | 47% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 26 | PARO Lewis | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 27 | VIZCARRA Nathan | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 28 | ANTONINI Lorenzo | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.