Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHOU Kevin | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
| 2 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 45% |
| 3 | CHAVES Matthew J. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 3 | LEE Justin | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
| 5 | JOHNSON Langston C. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% | |
| 6 | MOOREHEAD Patrick | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 7 | REN Richard | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 8 | OH Triton | - | 8% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 9 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 10 | FENG Leo | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 46% | 19% |
| 11 | LEE Aydan J. | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 12 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 13% | |
| 13 | LU Caleb Q. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 14 | SHERWOOD Hayden F. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | GRASS James D. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 16 | BLECKNER Noah | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | YEE Evan J. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 18 | MEHTA Krish | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | KIM Jeremy Y. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 13% | |
| 20 | ETIN Ari | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 21 | REN James | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 22 | GAUVEY Kieran | 9% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | COX Luis E. | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | WELLS Griffin | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 25 | GAO Andrew | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | OLIVER Isaac | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | - | - | |
| 27 | HOLDEN Joseph | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | NAZAROV Adilzhan | 32% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 30 | QI Eric K. | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | DAKIN Joseph | 42% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.