Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MIN MAGNOLIA | - | - | - | 13% | 86% | |
2 | KEE Bea Isabelle | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
3 | KIM Angelina | - | 3% | 27% | 65% | 6% | |
3 | YANG Alisa | 9% | 39% | 42% | 10% | - | |
5 | QIU Emily | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% |
6 | CHAWLA Aanya | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
7 | ZHU Serene M. | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 10% | |
8 | JAKEL Alysa C. | - | 2% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 8% |
9 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 29% |
10 | TAYLOR Kylin | - | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% |
11 | LIU Nicole | 13% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
12 | KOKE Kristen | 56% | 37% | 7% | - | - | |
13 | YOU Emily | 22% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
14 | JONES Charlotte | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | |
15 | LINCOLN Clare | 54% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - |
16 | WU Rebecca | 11% | 48% | 38% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.