Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MIN MAGNOLIA | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 42% | 
| 2 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% | 
| 3 | RICHARDSON Lauren C. | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | 
| 3 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | 
| 5 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 
| 6 | LEE Yedda | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 
| 7 | TOLBA Salma | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% | 
| 8 | HU Chelsea | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | 
| 9 | YANG Alisa | 26% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - | 
| 10 | LEE Anna | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | 
| 11 | CHAWLA Aanya | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 4% | 
| 12 | KIM Angelina | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | 
| 13 | MCKINLEY Kylie K. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | 
| 14 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% | 
| 15 | LONG Madeline M. | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | 
| 16 | MACEDON Gianna | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | 
| 17 | LIU Nicole | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | 
| 18 | DREFKE Sigrid | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | 
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.