Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CARTER Austin L. | V V D V D | V V V V V | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
| 2 | SINGH Meet | V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | SKOLNICK Michael W. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | FAYVUSOVICH Emmanual | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 5 | SIMANDJUNTAK Joshua | D V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 6 | SINGH Evangelina | V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 7 | SHEYNKMAN Leon | V V V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 8 | TINGLE Byrd | V D V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 9 | HINDS David E. | V V D V V V | V D | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
| 10 | SIMANJUNTAK Jocelyn | V D V V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 11 | VOORHEES Owen | V V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | SOPHRONIUS Jeddie | V V V D D V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 13 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | D V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 14 | MITCHELL Robert | V V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 15 | BLUHM Kyle | V D D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 16 | HAVERSON Rana | V V D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 17 | SHANKS Jennifer | V V V D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 18 | SOTO Alejandro | V V D D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 19 | FISHER Edward | V D V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 20 | GALVAN Omar | D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 21 | TOLENTINO SR. Francis | D V V V D D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 22 | SCHICKEL Juliana | D D V V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 23 | GALVAN Ivan | D D D V V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 24 | ALLEN Lily | D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 25 | KARNAVAS William | D D V D V | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 26 | RAGOSTA James | V D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 27 | SHIPMAN Steven | V V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 28 | GUARDIOLA Emily | D D D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 29 | BLEVINS Carolyn | D D D V V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 30 | RYAN Sean | D V D D D V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 31 | TRUDEAU Allison | D D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 32 | LI Happy | D D V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 33 | VIEZCA Olivia | D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 34 | BAMZAI Shaila | V D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 35 | MAYBERRY Kate | D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 35 | COLEMAN William | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 37 | DILLENBACK Isaiah | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 37 | BORLIN Caleb | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.