Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% | |
| 2 | CHANG Eliot A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 3 | LEONARD Cole | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 3 | GILMORE Thomas W. | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 41% | 9% | |
| 5 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
| 6 | GRASS James D. | 1% | 14% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 7 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% | |
| 8 | DU Gavin J. | - | 6% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% | |
| 9 | MENSAH Kennedy C | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 10 | KENNEDY Liam A. | - | - | 8% | 32% | 42% | 18% | |
| 11 | JOHNSON Langston C. | - | - | 9% | 35% | 41% | 15% | |
| 12 | LEE Justin | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 1% | |
| 13 | FENG Leo | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 14 | COX Luis E. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 15 | MOOREHEAD Patrick | 11% | 42% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | YOUNG Sean | 46% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 17 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 18 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 7% | |
| 19 | DESHETLER Scott | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 20 | BLECKNER Noah | 7% | 36% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | JACOBS Logan | 7% | 50% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | LU Caleb Q. | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 23 | MOLINARO Lawrence | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | JOHNSTON Bennett S. | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.