Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Aydan J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 40% | 17% |
| 3 | GAUVEY Kieran | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 3 | OH Triton | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 5 | ETIN Ari | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 35% | 5% |
| 6 | HU Christopher | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
| 7 | YEE Ethan C. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 8 | LARRAZOLO Vincent | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 9 | MEHTA Krish | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
| 10 | REN James | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 11 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 12 | SU Landon | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 78% |
| 13 | GAO Andrew | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 14 | QI Eric K. | 2% | 15% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 15 | PATEL Rayn | - | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | YAN William | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 17 | PREUD'HOMME Guillaume | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 18 | BAKALOV Alex | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 19 | CUMMINGS Ian | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 20 | PENG Victor | 4% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 21 | GARDNER Sebastian | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 22 | WANG Max | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 23 | GUYDOUK Alexey | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 25 | GUREVICH Savely | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 26 | SAPIR Alex | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 28 | JOSEF Asher | 18% | 47% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.