Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 11% |
2 | SHEALY Maggie | - | - | 3% | 20% | 50% | 28% |
3 | PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 26% | |
3 | TUCKER Iman R. | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% |
5 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% |
6 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 40% |
7 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | - | 7% | 31% | 44% | 16% | 2% |
8 | OLSEN Natalie J. | - | 14% | 40% | 36% | 10% | |
9 | CANSECO Laura K. | - | 19% | 43% | 31% | 7% | |
10 | CHANG Emily | - | 15% | 40% | 35% | 10% | |
11 | LU Yi Lin | 13% | 48% | 32% | 7% | - | - |
12 | LIAO Siwen | 2% | 20% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - |
13 | NI Sharon | 8% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
14 | DAHLKEMPER Audrey G. | 8% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - |
14 | WU Cici | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
16 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - |
17 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 97% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.