March NAC

Div II Men's Saber

Monday, March 9, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Huntington Convention Center of Cleveland - Cleveland, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GERSTMANN Max T. - - 1% 7% 26% 42% 24%
2 BOLLU Viren - - 4% 17% 36% 34% 10%
3 BRIMMER Robert (Trey) - 2% 14% 34% 37% 13%
3 KHOTLINE Daniel 1% 7% 22% 36% 27% 8%
5 DAI Zihou - 1% 8% 27% 41% 23%
6 HUBLALL Ethan - - - 6% 27% 45% 22%
7 LI Cooper - 4% 21% 42% 28% 5%
8 JONES Graham H. - 1% 7% 26% 42% 25%
9 LIU Victor - - 5% 22% 45% 28%
10 NOTOPRADONO Nicholas - - 2% 12% 32% 38% 15%
11 GRIGORIEV Roman - 1% 4% 15% 31% 34% 16%
12 HENRY Cadel - 4% 19% 37% 30% 8%
13 ORIE Sohan 1% 9% 29% 40% 19% 2%
14 WONG Hawken 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 6%
15 WONG Ron - 5% 19% 34% 29% 11% 2%
16 SUH Leo - 4% 15% 31% 31% 16% 3%
17 ZWAKA Jonas - - 2% 10% 29% 39% 20%
18 LIN Grant - - 1% 7% 25% 42% 26%
19 LEE Brady - - 5% 18% 35% 32% 10%
20 SOULES-ONO Makoa 1% 8% 25% 34% 23% 8% 1%
21 KIM Leo 12% 41% 33% 12% 2% < 1% -
22 ATWOOD Griffin - - 1% 7% 35% 57%
23 KOZLOV Lucas 1% 9% 29% 37% 20% 4%
24 CHEN Jack 1% 10% 31% 38% 18% 3%
25 WANG Zixin - - 5% 22% 41% 27% 6%
26 WANG Matthew - - 2% 11% 30% 38% 18%
27 WANG Alex - - 4% 17% 35% 33% 11%
28 LEVY Jack - 3% 13% 30% 34% 17% 3%
29 YU xiaodao 1% 6% 21% 36% 29% 9%
30 WEI Lucas - 3% 13% 28% 33% 19% 5%
31 QUIRK Dylan - 3% 14% 30% 32% 17% 3%
32 CHENG Brandon - 5% 21% 37% 29% 8%
33 CHEN Shawn - - 4% 18% 35% 32% 10%
34 GONG Gavin - 2% 13% 32% 37% 16%
35 SONG Aidan - 1% 10% 30% 40% 19%
36 YU Jayden - 1% 8% 32% 47% 12%
37 LUAN Mark - - 3% 14% 31% 35% 16%
38 HERNANDEZ Stanton - - 2% 10% 29% 39% 20%
39 SIDDAMSHETTY Ishaan - - 6% 24% 38% 26% 6%
40 DESSAUER Tobyn M. - - - 4% 21% 45% 30%
41 HONG Aidan 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 5% -
42 VO Blake - 2% 11% 30% 39% 18%
43 ROSADO Sebastian - 2% 14% 38% 38% 8%
44 WANG William - 1% 12% 37% 39% 11%
45 ZHANG Shaoxuan 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 5%
46 CHEN Zhengming - 2% 20% 38% 29% 10% 1%
47 LIANG Morgan - 5% 18% 32% 30% 13% 2%
48 ROH Jaden - 2% 13% 33% 34% 15% 2%
49 GUVEN Derin 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
50 TOZZI Massimo - - 2% 11% 29% 39% 19%
51 TASIKAS Pete - 1% 11% 32% 36% 17% 3%
52 RIGGINS Littleton K. - - 2% 11% 29% 39% 19%
52 AN Chris 1% 13% 36% 36% 13% 2% -
54 KIM Enoch - 2% 10% 28% 35% 21% 4%
55 TANG Morgan - 2% 8% 23% 34% 25% 7%
56 PEREIRA Beckham 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7%
57 BAHK Caleb 10% 31% 35% 19% 5% -
58 COUNTS Nicholas - 5% 20% 35% 28% 10% 1%
59 SONG Ryan 20% 43% 28% 8% 1% - -
60 NAMBIAR Navin 1% 5% 17% 30% 29% 14% 3%
61 KANIA Alexander - 3% 14% 30% 32% 16% 3%
62 RODRIGUEZ Erik - 4% 17% 35% 32% 11%
63 BEAL Colton 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% -
64 XIE Justin 16% 40% 33% 11% 1% -
65 JAIDEVA Aakash - 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
66 KANG Jeremy 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5%
67 SRIVATSAV Anay 1% 9% 26% 35% 22% 6% 1%
68 BOSITA Brennan 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 6%
69 HAO Johnny 1% 5% 18% 31% 29% 14% 3%
70 LAZARTE Gabriel - 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7%
71 TRZEPLA Max - - 8% 28% 38% 22% 4%
72 CHEN Felix 4% 17% 31% 29% 15% 4% -
73 SOKOLOV Lucas 13% 33% 32% 16% 4% 1% -
74 BROOKS Drake 3% 29% 40% 22% 5% 1% -
75 RODRIGUEZ Darlin - - - 5% 32% 63%
76 PERRIN Leo 2% 17% 42% 31% 8% 1%
77 SUBA Mason 2% 20% 42% 30% 6% -
78 KIM Suin 14% 46% 31% 7% 1% -
78 ZHU Bob 7% 27% 37% 23% 6% 1%
80 SRIVATSAV Ishaan - 5% 23% 37% 25% 8% 1%
81 KARAVAS Nicholas - - 1% 7% 25% 42% 26%
82 LEE Nathan Uju - - 4% 15% 33% 35% 13%
83 LOPER Alex - 4% 20% 36% 28% 10% 1%
84 RAMBHIA Smit 19% 38% 29% 11% 2% - -
85 MBERIA Alexander - 2% 11% 30% 35% 18% 3%
86 WONG Reagan 3% 15% 33% 32% 15% 2%
86 VISH Manyu - 5% 20% 35% 28% 10% 1%
88 HOLMES Xavier 2% 13% 34% 33% 15% 3% -
89 LI Ryan 1% 14% 33% 33% 16% 4% -
90 BIVIJI Adam 4% 18% 31% 29% 14% 4% -
91 NGUYEN Ethan 14% 41% 32% 11% 2% - -
92 TURNER Benjamin - 3% 16% 35% 32% 12% 2%
93 TENG Lucas 8% 30% 39% 20% 4% -
94 HRISTOV Nickolas 4% 22% 40% 28% 6% -
95 LE CORVEC Thomas 16% 39% 32% 11% 2% -
96 AERY FALLICK Ozzie - - 1% 13% 41% 45%
97 AWAD Omar 32% 42% 21% 5% - -
98 YU BOWEN - 1% 6% 25% 45% 24%
99 YANG LOUIS 8% 32% 39% 18% 3% -
100 LEE Hanho - 4% 16% 34% 33% 13%
101 MIAO Heqi 5% 23% 36% 26% 9% 1%
102 HAN Kyle 25% 42% 26% 7% 1% -
103 GATTO Enzo P. 3% 15% 29% 30% 17% 5% 1%
104 BRISENO Ethan 2% 11% 27% 32% 21% 7% 1%
105 D'AMELJ Edoardo 3% 15% 29% 30% 17% 5% 1%
106 WEHLE Paul - - < 1% 3% 17% 42% 37%
107 LIAO Sirui 2% 14% 34% 33% 14% 3% -
108 CHANG Ethan - 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1%
109 PIPKE Garrett 11% 31% 34% 18% 5% 1% -
110 NGO Emerson 1% 12% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
111 SMITH Etienne 17% 38% 31% 12% 2% -
112 LO Elroy 3% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
113 SO Morgan 1% 13% 36% 36% 12% 2% -
113 BANSAL Krishiv - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
113 LEHMAN Matthew - 2% 11% 26% 33% 21% 5%
116 WANG ARAN 10% 33% 36% 17% 4% -
117 MAI Carl D. - 1% 7% 24% 37% 26% 6%
118 PARIKH Saavn 8% 32% 39% 18% 3% -
119 BARENBOYM Michael 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2%
120 QI Jeremy 5% 29% 41% 22% 4% -
121 IVANOV Daniel 52% 38% 10% 1% - -
122 SHANKAR Rahm 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
123 HWANG Hagan 12% 32% 34% 17% 4% -
125 BURLA Saiavaneesh 26% 59% 14% 1% - - -
126 WOLMART Zander 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 3%
127 VIDREVICH David 55% 37% 7% 1% - -
128 ROBINSON Ezra 28% 44% 23% 5% 1% -
129 LI Qiuye - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6%
130 TOSCANO Sebastian 1% 8% 22% 32% 25% 10% 2%
131 HAIRABEDIAN Ellis 4% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
132 ZALEVSKY Liam 2% 14% 31% 32% 17% 4% -
133 BUCKLEY Owen 21% 42% 28% 8% 1% -
134 YU Ronen 3% 19% 36% 29% 11% 2% -
135 LAU Kyrus - 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1%
136 LAMADRID Zachary 53% 38% 9% 1% - - -
137 KUNIMOTO Adam 45% 39% 13% 2% - - -
138 SHARMA Smyan 61% 33% 6% - - - -
139 YANG Jake 4% 23% 37% 26% 9% 1% -
140 KUSHKOV Michael 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% -
141 KIM ZOLLER Jacob 82% 17% 1% - - - -
142 RHODES Bryce 41% 42% 14% 2% - - -
142 KONDOGI Saivarun 7% 27% 36% 22% 7% 1% -
144 ZHOU Ruibo 38% 41% 17% 3% - - -
145 ORLINO Sam 32% 41% 21% 5% 1% - -
146 CHAVAN Aditya 8% 39% 38% 13% 2% - -
147 GRIFFIN Sid 69% 26% 4% - - - -
148 MILLS Matthew P. 25% 41% 25% 7% 1% -
149 BURENKOV Matthew 7% 26% 35% 23% 7% 1% -
151 LI Kent 32% 44% 19% 4% - - -
152 CHU-NAFPLIOTIS Weston 36% 43% 18% 3% - -
153 WERNER Jonah 59% 37% 4% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.