Maplewood, NJ - Maplewood, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | REN Junming | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 2 | YEN Darren | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | WOOD Elden S. | D D V V D | V V V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 3 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 5 | DENNER Lysander H. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 6 | HARRIS Alex K. | V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 7 | HONG Marshall Q. | D D D V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 8 | SO Hananiah | V D D V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 9 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | V D V D V V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 10 | LOBO-BERG Gabriel (G) K. | D V D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 11 | QUAN Nicholas | V V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 13 | GOSALIA Rishab | D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 14 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | V V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 15 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | V D V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | D V V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 17 | CHOU Stephen C. | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | ODIERNO Payton W. | D V V V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 19 | HUDDY Brandon J. | V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 20 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 21 | GILES Jeremy M. | V V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 22 | HUAYTA James W. | D V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 23 | MORREALE John | D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 23 | LAURIN Charles-Antoine | V V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 25 | CHO Brandon | D V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 26 | LASORSA Matthew | V V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 27 | METTKE Nathaniel | D V V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 28 | YEN Preston | V D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 29 | LIN William | D V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 30 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | D D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 31 | SHERR Cameron E. | D V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 32 | VACCARI Braden | V D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 33 | ZU Kevin | V D V D V D | D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
| 34 | ZHOU Miles | V D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 35 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | V V D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 35 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 37 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | V D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 38 | GILLIGAN Wolff | V D V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 39 | NOLTEMY Daniel J. | V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 40 | TORRENTE Jacinto | V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 41 | QIN Alexander | D V D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 42 | BROWNE JR Rolston D. | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 43 | TREJO Oliver | D D V D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 44 | GHOSH Tuhin | D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 45 | LIU Kelly | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 46 | FISK Ethan | D D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 47 | CHAN Daniel | D D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 48 | XU Michael | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 49 | TANG Albert | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 50 | ZATZ Ben Z. | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.