Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 78% |
| 2 | FANG Kelervia | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 56% | |
| 3 | THERON Zoe | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
| 3 | JIN Jada Y | - | - | 1% | 19% | 56% | 23% | |
| 5 | DESAI Zoya | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 6 | DAI Iris Yuyang | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 57% |
| 7 | KIM Natalie | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 8 | HSU Rachel | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 39% | |
| 9 | RUI Jessie | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% | |
| 10 | GOWDA Siyona | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 11 | FAN Sophia | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
| 12 | AHN Hayley | - | - | 1% | 13% | 41% | 40% | 5% |
| 13 | ZHANG Hannah | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 14 | YUNG Zoe | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 6% |
| 15 | CHEN Summer | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 47% | 11% | |
| 16 | CHOI Jian | - | - | 5% | 33% | 44% | 17% | 1% |
| 17 | LUCAS Ava | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 23% |
| 18 | KIM Ines | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 23% | 2% |
| 19 | YU Xintong | - | 4% | 25% | 45% | 22% | 3% | |
| 20 | ALEKSANDROVA Mira | 8% | 38% | 45% | 8% | < 1% | - | |
| 21 | SANTIAGO Rania | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 21 | HAYLETT Emily | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% |
| 23 | CHEN Madeleine | - | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 4% |
| 24 | BANDZELADZE Emma | - | - | 7% | 36% | 42% | 14% | 1% |
| 25 | CHUNG Katie | - | - | 4% | 24% | 49% | 23% | |
| 26 | TEWARI Amaira | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 43% | 7% |
| 27 | LING Camryn | - | 2% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | NICOLETTI Thea | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 29 | DONG Nancy | - | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 30 | LAVERY Lucy | - | 1% | 15% | 57% | 25% | 3% | |
| 31 | FU Joy | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
| 32 | IRELAND Moira | - | 2% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | KHANAL Sarah | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
| 34 | POEI Meagan | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 35 | QIAO Lori-Ann | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
| 36 | YANG Byanca | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 37 | LAI Olivia | 9% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | BHANGOO Paloma | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 39 | LI Annabelle | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | BASTUNAS Marissa | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 41 | ZHANG Annabelle | 2% | 18% | 46% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | YUEN Kaitlyn | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% | 1% | |
| 43 | GUO Jianing | 4% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | FAN Lauren | 2% | 20% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 45 | LIU Madeleine | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | SHIN Ellie | 43% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | RENGANATHAN Krithiga | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | OH Amber | 13% | 38% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ARCE BASURCO Juliana | 7% | 34% | 40% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | DOMANTAY Sophia | 46% | 43% | 11% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | YANG Claire | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | FENG Sophia | 19% | 49% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 53 | TANG Clementine | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | LEE Clara | 20% | 52% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | STOCK Nina | 51% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | HSZIEH Evelyn | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | KIM Chloe | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | ISBELL Nora | 24% | 51% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 59 | YUEN Hannah | 29% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | LUO Olivia | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 61 | CHOI Mackenzie | 49% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 62 | SUTTON Sadie | 19% | 50% | 28% | 3% | - | - | |
| 63 | SOUSA Lauren | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | YU-TAN Claire | 5% | 31% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | LI Sophia | 19% | 43% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | YOU Mina | 30% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 67 | GAMACHE Camdyn Harper | 54% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.