Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% |
| 2 | GATTO Enzo P. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 3 | IYER Neil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 20% | |
| 3 | KITSON Chase | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% |
| 5 | SANCHEZ Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% |
| 6 | DOOLEY Atticus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 3% | |
| 7 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 34% |
| 8 | CHOW William T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | |
| 9 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 9 | CAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 11 | JOUFFLINEAU Yohann | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 12 | EKAMBARAM Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 13 | ANUMULA Aryan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 14 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 15 | CHEN Cooper | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 16 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 17 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | |
| 18 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 19 | AN Chris | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | FAN Hsiao-Kai(Kai) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 21 | LI Alex Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
| 22 | WANG Alex | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 23 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 35% |
| 24 | CHAN Elliott | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 25 | LI Leo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
| 26 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 14% |
| 27 | ZEYU wu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
| 28 | ZHAO Chen Fei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% |
| 29 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | TAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 31 | LO Elroy | 100% | 98% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CHI Everett | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 34 | LI AYDEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 35 | ZHOU William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | |
| 36 | MEADE Liam R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 37 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
| 38 | LI Cooper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
| 39 | COBIAN Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% |
| 40 | GU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% |
| 41 | CHAN Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 7% |
| 42 | TSENG Cooper | 100% | 97% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | WANG David | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | WINTERSET Mason | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 19% | 1% | |
| 45 | SUN Ryan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 46 | BROWN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 25% | 4% | |
| 47 | TANI Tino | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
| 48 | PEREIRA Beckham | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 11% |
| 49 | SUN Eon | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 50 | SINGHAL Armaan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
| 51 | ROSALES Vincent | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 52 | KIM Enoch | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 53 | SANCHEZ William | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | VO Landon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 55 | XIE Justin | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 56 | CHEN Shawn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 57 | TANG Morgan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 58 | KANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% | |
| 59 | JAMBUSARIA Aum | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 60 | BAGGA Shray | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 61 | BRUM Charles E. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 62 | YU Casey | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 63 | RONG Jasper | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 64 | HONG Aidan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 65 | CHEUNG Evan | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | LEE Brady | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
| 67 | CHAN Troy Devon | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
| 68 | KULKARNI Shreyas | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 69 | ROBUCHON Aleksandr | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 70 | BODMER Erik | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 71 | FISCHER Noel | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 72 | NAZIF Laith | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 73 | HERRERA Stefano | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 74 | SEELMAN Cole | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 75 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 84% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 76 | HONG Arick | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 77 | HAOSONG Oscar | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | LIU Clarence | 100% | 87% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 79 | LIAO Yifong | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | 1% |
| 80 | WU Garrick | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 81 | LING Carson Jr | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 82 | RAPHAEL Pierson | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 83 | GONZALEZ Mark | 100% | 90% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 84 | XIAO Yi | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | FRENCILLO Daryl | 100% | 92% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 86 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 87 | HAN Kyle | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 88 | KIM Leo | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | YANG Jake | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 91 | RAIN (CHO YU) Tian | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 93 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | 100% | 65% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 94 | HAMDAN Zachery | 100% | 25% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.