MSA Sports Spot - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GONZALEZ Lauren | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 2 | HUANG Emma | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 44% |
| 3 | KIM Yuna | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
| 3 | LEE Eun-Hae | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% | |
| 5 | KASHUBA Mila | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 6 | ZHANG Selina | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 7 | CULLIVAN Elise | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 8 | JIANG Mujing | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 9 | FAROOQI Eliora | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 10% |
| 10 | LIU Sophia | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 11 | JIMÉNEZ PELAY Claudia | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 12 | SAVIOZ Naomi | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 31% | 7% |
| 13 | HUANG Rosalyn | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 14 | FANG Yining | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 15 | HEWITT Madison | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | ZENG Linya | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | LOPUS Marlena | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 18 | GISZCZAK Emma | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 19 | ZMUDA Jordan | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 20 | WELTER Gemma | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 21 | KAGAN Natalie | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 22 | LALONDE Beatrice | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | LI Claire | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 24 | FANG Savannah | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | XU Scarlett | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 26 | GANOCY Sloane | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | GONZALEZ Alexandra | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 28 | CURRIER-BLAGG Bryn | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | KIM Soeun | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 30 | BADER Mia | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 31 | TINGSTAD Rosa | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | LIU Doris | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | HUANG Charise | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | DALY Layla | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 35 | MA Annabella | 5% | 33% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | KASHUBA Adriana | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | ROLKOWSKI Mia | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | CHEW Ellsey | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | KUE Nahla | 16% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | DALY Ava | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | KU Natalie | < 1% | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.