Atlantic City Convention Center - Hall D - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BRAGG Leah | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% | |
| 2 | LIANG Carina | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 7% | |
| 3 | GANSER Nicole | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 3 | MENG YIFAN | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 5 | YAO Chloe | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
| 6 | CHEN Laila | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 7 | ZHENG Erin | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 6% | |
| 8 | IVANOV Angela-Sophie | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 9 | SHEFFIELD Skye | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 52% | |
| 10 | FURMAN Maria | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 82% | |
| 11 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
| 12 | LI Nicole | 3% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 9% | - | |
| 13 | CHEN Alicia | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 11% | |
| 14 | CHAKRAPANI Tara | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 15 | GRUDZINSKI Josephine | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 16 | MONITTO Malina | 3% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 10% | - | |
| 17 | JU Jennifer | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
| 18 | HU Constance | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 19 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | |
| 20 | PETROFF Eva | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
| 21 | HOWARD Katherine | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
| 22 | FURMAN Elizabeth | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | LIU Lillian | 2% | 15% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 24 | ZHENG Kristen | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 25 | XIAO Katelyn | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 33% | 7% |
| 26 | REYES Camila | 5% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | NOLAN Sophia | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 2% | |
| 28 | JAISON Carol | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 29 | GARCIA Alysia | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 30 | BUES Caelan | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | KRUG Ally | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | HALL Henrietta | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | PETRIZZO Anna | 1% | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 34 | CHEN Sunny | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | MOLAN Ava | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 36 | DATSON Mia | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | YU Livia | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
| 38 | ZHANG Anna | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | AUDET Scarlett | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | SHETH Anayaà | < 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 41 | MILLER Cassandra | 4% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 42 | TOBY kaja | 28% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | REARDON Isabella | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | CABRERA QUINTANA Lucrecia | 1% | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.