Atlantic City Convention Center - Hall D - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TASIKAS Peter | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 2 | ROMBERG Sam | V V V V D | V V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | WAXLER Alex | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | CHANG Timothy | V D V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 5 | ZHANG Howard | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 6 | SCHWARTZMAN Jakub | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 7 | ZHANG Mark | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | ALUF Brendon | V D V D V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 9 | AVERY Marcus | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 10 | LEE Ryan | V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | LEIGH Brayden | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 12 | SONG Ryan | V D D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 13 | BURCH III Andrew J. | D V D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 14 | GAW Christian | D V V D D | V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 15 | JAKOSALEM Dean | D D D V D | V V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 16 | PLAWNER Eli | D D V D D D | V V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 17 | AWAD Omar | V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 18 | KONG Ethan | D V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 19 | CONNOLLY Edward Bud | V V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 20 | GAIDA Ashton | V V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 21 | THOMAS Tre | V V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 21 | TO Aiden | D V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 23 | CHAN Ewan | V V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 24 | GRIFFIN Sid | V D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 25 | REQUENA GARCIA Diego | D V V V D | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 26 | GUERRA Corey | V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 27 | O'KEEFE Brody | D D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 28 | BALTRUSAITIS Lucas Tommaso | D V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 29 | DARLING Andrew | D V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 30 | LENDVAI Lorand | D V V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 31 | VIDREVICH David | V D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 32 | KRISHNAN Arjun | D D D D V V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 33 | GAW Zachary | D V V V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 34 | VINCENT Yijia | D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 35 | HONG Isaac | V V D D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 36 | YU Dylan | D V D V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 37 | HUANG KIMBALL | V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 38 | VYAS Viaan | V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 39 | CORDERO Adam | D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 40 | KRISHNARASA Aiyann | D D V V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 41 | RAJMOHAN Syon | V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 42 | ZHERENOVSKY Alan | V D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 43 | RUBENSON Leo | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 44 | LEE SungYup | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 45 | VITALE NIKO | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 46 | PALERMO Evan | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 47 | YUN Matthew | D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 47 | SONG Jerry | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 49 | ZHA-ZHAO Max | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 50 | LI Sebastian | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 51 | THEETHIRA Kevin-Cariappa | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 51 | NEUBERGER Jakob Felix | D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
| 53 | BARAVARIAN Cole | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 54 | GLOZMAN Declan | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 55 | CHEN Samuel | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 56 | LI Xinren | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.