Atlantic City Convention Center - Hall D - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MELNYCHUK Yelyzaveta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% |
| 2 | HU Anna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 3 | GHOSH Priyanka | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 31% | |
| 3 | GENTILE Vittoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 1% |
| 5 | JOHN Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 6 | NG Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 7 | HO Sophia | 100% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 8 | FOSS Persephone | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 9 | WANG MONA | 100% | 99% | 87% | 42% | 5% | - | |
| 10 | WANG JiaQi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 11 | YANG Selina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 12 | BARNES Sarah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 9% | - |
| 13 | STADNIK Emilia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 14 | DANK Dina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 54% | |
| 15 | CHEN Victoria | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 16 | NADINA Ksenia | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 17 | MYAT Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 18 | DATLA Aanya | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | < 1% | - | - |
| 19 | COLTER Aurora | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
| 20 | KNOBEL Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
| 21 | LIU Stephanie | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | NEDOPAKA Kateryna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 12% |
| 23 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
| 24 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 25 | LOURENCO Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 26 | LAFFY Lily | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 27 | LIU Teresa | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | MCSWEENEY Kylie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 29 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 30 | VATS Ishita | 100% | 99% | 87% | 44% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | NANDA Maanika | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 33 | HOLMES Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | 3% |
| 34 | LIANG Claire | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | GOODWIN Julia | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | KIM Jodie | 100% | 91% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 38 | JEON Kristen | 100% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | TASSONE Charlie | 100% | 88% | 35% | 5% | - | - | |
| 40 | ZHANG Wuxin | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | BUCKLEY Isabella | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | MADDISON Erica | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 43 | ZHANG Emily | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | INNASIMUTHU Michelle | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 45 | ZENG Jiawen | 100% | 86% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | NAMBIAR Mayukha | 100% | 71% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.