Dallas Market Hall MAIN HALL - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAISONET-GUZMAN Hector E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% | |
| 2 | KIM Gene | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 3 | HERNDON Liam | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 5 | HURME Tommi K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
| 6 | THAYER Jake T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% | |
| 7 | LIBSON Tazman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 8 | MICU Constantin | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 9 | HALLMAN Nicholas (Nick) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 29% |
| 10 | ELLISON Harper F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | ||
| 11 | VILLAREAL Quentin | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 12 | SAYLOR Harrison G. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 18% | 2% | |
| 13 | POWELL John M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 14 | GRAY Connor W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | PETROSEWICZ Thomas (TJ) ". | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 17% | |
| 16 | LIM Robert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | 3% |
| 17 | QIAN Irvine | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 18 | NIXON Scott | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 19 | CORTRIGHT Caedmon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 34% | 5% |
| 20 | KRAMER Jack P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 27% | |
| 21 | JAUME Andrei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 22 | POHL Philip | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 23 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 24 | VAN RIET Stefan | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 25 | ELLISOR Drayten | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | DADE MAXIMUS | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | MANGAN Hunter | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 3% | ||
| 28 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 29 | GOODMAN Benjamin | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | ||
| 30 | SATHYAN Dev | 100% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | ||
| 31 | KASKAN Peter E. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 6% | ||
| 32 | DARWIN Michael | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | GONZALEZ Kian | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 34 | WINKLER Michael | 100% | 94% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | ZHAN ETHAN | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 36 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 100% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 37 | BRUS Brian V. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | SMITH Samuel J. | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 38 | HORD Jacob | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.