Dallas Market Hall MAIN HALL - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARK Geraldyn Sojung | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 2 | MOON Claire | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
| 3 | COLTER Aurora | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 36% | 8% |
| 3 | WILSON Eva | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 5 | KIM Catherine | - | - | - | - | 8% | 52% | 39% |
| 5 | XIAO Cindy | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 7 | DUFF Caitlin | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 8 | PEREIRA Izumi | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 9 | KONDEV Elizabeth | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 10 | KO Ariel | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 11 | LUKER Hannah | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 37% | 5% | - |
| 12 | SUNG Olivia | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 13 | HUANG Valencia | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 14 | TENG Christine Renmei | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 15 | HAM Elizabeth | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 16 | LAI Karen | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 17 | CHERON Helene | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 18 | ZHU Avril | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 19 | O’REAR Reghan W. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 47% | 43% |
| 20 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% |
| 21 | CHANG Annette | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 22 | KANG Soeun | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 23 | JOSHI Samika | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 24 | KU Chloe | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 25 | SADANI Jyotika | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 26 | MATSUO Kei | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 27 | LU QIWEN | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | YE Madeleine | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 29 | OH Chloe | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | CHA Jungyun | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | WITEK Isabelle | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | MEADE Kaia G. | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | CHERUKURI Tanvi | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 34 | ALTMAN Leigh | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 35 | HU Heidi | 4% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | SEO Yunseo | 36% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | SEAL Ayda | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | OOI Elise | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | LIM Eunice | 20% | 45% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | GILLENTINE Madelyn | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | ROMERO Aanandhamayi | 8% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 42 | KIM Grace M. | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.