Atlantic City Convention Center - Hall D - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHAU Zoey | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 2 | ZHAO Selena | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 49% | |
| 3 | CAFAGNA Sofia | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 3 | SUN Yi | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 37% | 51% |
| 5 | LAFFY Lily | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 6 | ZHANG Wuxin | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 7 | WANG Chloe | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 8 | DEMRY Kylee | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 9 | BORGUETA Madison | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 10 | HILD Anya | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 11 | VATS Ishita | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 12 | KIM Grace | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 8% | |
| 13 | ZHANG Ashley | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 14 | TASSONE Charlie | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 15 | KIM Jodie | 5% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | LIU Stephanie | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 17 | FOSS Persephone | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 18 | SMITH Genevieve | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | WANG JiaQi | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
| 20 | HO Sophia | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 21 | YIN Xizi | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 22 | HUANG Pierra | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 23 | WONG Charlene | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 24 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | WANG MONA | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 15% | |
| 26 | YANG Selina | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 27 | ZHANG Cecilia | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | REDA Sophie | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 29 | LEE Grace | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 30 | ZHANG Nikki | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | CHAN Isla | 22% | 39% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | PARK Gabriella | < 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | ALMEDA Galina | 3% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | AN Jamie | 3% | 21% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 36 | ILAGAN Ava | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 15% |
| 37 | MADDISON Erica | 38% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 38 | ONO Lisa | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | CHEN Victoria | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 40 | JUN Sofia | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 41 | LIANG Claire | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 8% |
| 42 | LIU Alyssa | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 43 | KIM Irene | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 3% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 45 | DATLA Aanya | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | PATEL Maia | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 47 | JEON Kristen | 27% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | LIU Teresa | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 49 | LEE Kaitlin | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 50 | UZAR Julianna | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 51 | FANG Darcy | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 52 | ZHANG Emily | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | - | 2% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 6% | |
| 54 | LAU Angela | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 55 | DILALLO Olivia | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | PARKER Mrinali | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 57 | MARGULIS Roxana | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 58 | KANG Ellie | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | LIAO Audrey | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | FANG Elena | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 61 | LIAO Amber | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 62 | BUCCINO Sloane | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | KAYA Lara | < 1% | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 64 | MADDISON Estelle | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | INNASIMUTHU Michelle | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 66 | NAMBIAR Mayukha | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.