Salle Auriol Seattle - Seattle, WA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BALDWIN Seth K. | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 2 | SUVOROV Yuly | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 3 | AMELI Sean | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 5 | GILLER Irving | V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 6 | WINSLOW Chris D. | V V V D | V V V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 7 | HARGROVE Charles | V D V D V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 8 | BOTHELIO Jere P. | D D V V D | V V V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 9 | FRANK Fred | V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 10 | KURYLO Steven | V V V V D V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 11 | KROGH Daniel (Dan) M. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 12 | REID Brentwood P. | V D V V V V | V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
| 13 | CRANOR Erich L. | V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 14 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 15 | KRYLTSOV Greg | D V V V D D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 16 | GLYNN Andrew | D V D D V D | V V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 17 | STOCK Jordan | V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 18 | KISSINGFORD John F. | V V V V V V | D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 18 | MAKMATOV Vadim | V V V V V V | D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 20 | ROBISON Lucas J. | V V D V D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 21 | GOOSSENS Bruno | V V D V D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 22 | SHIRAEV Dmitry | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 23 | DARRICAU OLY Henri J. | D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 24 | WILLIAMS Matt C. | V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 25 | SILKEY Jason | V D V D | V D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 26 | CROPLEY Theodore | V D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 27 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | V D V D D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 28 | REED David | D V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 29 | PELCZAR Jeffrey | V V D D V D | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 29 | KELLY Bradley | D V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 31 | STERLING William D. | D D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 32 | CHAKRABORTY Subhasish | D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 33 | SRIVASTAVA amitabh | V D D V V V | D | 1.3 | 4 | +2.7 |
| 34 | RAMIREZ Shawn | D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 35 | SPERANZA John | V V D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 36 | PETERSON Ryan | V D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 37 | MILLS Raymond | D D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 38 | DAN Chuntao | D D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 39 | VALENTINE Iain | V D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 40 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 42 | JOHNSON Brian | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 43 | CASONI Cory | D V D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 44 | CRETEN joachim | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 45 | CHAN Thomas | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 46 | HALLENBECK Patrick | D D D D V D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 47 | HARRISKING Josh | D V D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 48 | COOMBS Tim | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 49 | MURRAY Ross | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 50 | NABORS Ottie | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 51 | ROZALSKI Pavel | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 52 | SMITH Larry M. | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.