Atlantic City Convention Center - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 86% |
| 2 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 3 | LIU Qianchen E. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 44% | 43% | |
| 5 | LI Joy | - | - | 8% | 39% | 53% | ||
| 6 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | 2% | 13% | 45% | 40% | |
| 7 | WANG Joanna | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% | |
| 8 | SHENG Katherine | - | - | - | - | 2% | 25% | 72% |
| 9 | ZHANG Vivian | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 47% | 33% |
| 10 | MCSHERRY Kayla | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 48% | 32% |
| 11 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | - | 5% | 23% | 48% | 24% | |
| 12 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 13 | HAFEZ Sahar | 1% | 20% | 50% | 27% | 2% | ||
| 14 | WANG Amabel | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% | ||
| 15 | SHAOOLIAN Maya | - | 5% | 34% | 48% | 14% | ||
| 16 | DONG Iris | 1% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% | |
| 17 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | 1% | 13% | 54% | 32% | |
| 18 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 4% | |
| 19 | SIROTA Francis | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 12% |
| 20 | ZHU Alivia | 1% | 11% | 37% | 42% | 9% | - | |
| 21 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% | |
| 22 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 53% | 12% |
| 23 | ZEE Savannah | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 2% |
| 24 | CHAN Jolene | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | ZHANG Priscilla | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | - | 7% | 43% | 49% | |
| 27 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | 10% | 40% | 44% | 7% | ||
| 28 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | 5% | 26% | 48% | 21% | |
| 29 | REZA Fukaina | - | 9% | 45% | 38% | 8% | ||
| 30 | COLE Sofia | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 31 | REILLY Carys | 2% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 32 | MA Sophia | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | ZHANG Caroline | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 34 | LIU Bella | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 35 | ZHANG Selina | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 36 | LIU Caydence | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 37 | EPSTEIN Naomi | 8% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | WU Charlotte | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 39 | XING Melly | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 20% | 2% | |
| 40 | FENG Claire | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 41 | KOESTERS Florentine | 5% | 46% | 39% | 9% | - | ||
| 42 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 43 | LIGERET Stella | 3% | 23% | 44% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 9% | 38% | 40% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | ALBRECHT-SMITH Anne | 43% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 46 | CHO Olivia | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 47 | FRASER Morgan | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 48 | KHETPAL Aalia | 4% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | CHUNG Stella | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 49 | SHUI Zola | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | KUTATELADZE Anna | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 52 | YOUM Amelia | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | HUANG Gabrielle | 46% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | IWERSEN Marte | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 55 | BEKIYANTS Elizabeth | 9% | 61% | 26% | 3% | - | ||
| 56 | DZIWULSKI Elisabeth Claire | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | LEO Jenna | 6% | 33% | 43% | 17% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | DONG Katelyn | 18% | 46% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 59 | BELL Blake | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | ETIKALA Saanvi | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 61 | XU Charlene | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | HOU Xu | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | FAN Melody | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 64 | SHAOOLIAN Alexa | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | KOESTERS Cecilie | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | GUSTAFSSON Anna | 83% | 16% | - | - | - | ||
| 67 | LI Doreen | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 68 | JOHNSON Elizabeth | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | ||
| 69 | LENZ Phoebe | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.