Maplewood, NJ - Maplewood, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HONG Marshall Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 2 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% | |
| 3 | BROWNE JR Rolston D. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 4% | |
| 3 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 5 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 6 | TAKEMARU Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | |
| 7 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 8 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | |
| 9 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
| 10 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
| 11 | GHOSH Tuhin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 12 | QUAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
| 13 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 14 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 15 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 16 | CHAN Daniel | 100% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 8% | |
| 18 | LEVIN Mark A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 19 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 20 | CZAHA Balint | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
| 21 | CHAN Alexander S. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 22 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% | |
| 23 | VON TULGANBURG Cameron C. | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 25 | MORREALE John | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
| 26 | LIN William | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 28 | QIN Alexander | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | OLAODE Stephen | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 30 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 31 | MARTINEZ Justin | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 32 | JUN Ryan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 33 | TANG Albert | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | GILLIGAN Wolff | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 3% | |
| 35 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 36 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | LIU Kelly | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | TREJO Oliver | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | HAQ Kamran R. | 100% | 82% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 43 | SAINT-PIERRE-MENARD Colin | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | BLIM Charlie M. | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 47 | TORRENTE Jacinto | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | HONG Justin | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 48 | REDA Myles | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 50 | GOLD Jackson | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.