Atlantic City Convention Center - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ISAYENKO Daniel | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 2 | KOREN George | D V V V D V | V V V V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
| 3 | PARK Layne | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 3 | ALUF William | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 5 | ZHANG Weihang | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 6 | CHEN Ryan | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 7 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 8 | CIECIEREGA MATTHEW | D V V V D V | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 9 | LEVY Daniel | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 10 | PARK Sean | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 11 | CHEN Harrison | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 12 | HU Simon | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 13 | HENDERSON Louis | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 14 | ZHAO Alexander | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 15 | WANG Harrison | D V D V V D | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | SCHWARTZMAN Jakub | D V D D V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 17 | ARTETA-CHEVALIER Ulysse | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 18 | LEE Shane Gunn | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 19 | TO Aiden | V D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 20 | CHEN Brian | V V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 21 | FAVO Christopher | V V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 22 | MAKLIN David | V V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 23 | CHEN Luca | D V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 24 | LI Lucas | V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 25 | GUCCIARDI Francesco | V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 26 | BASU MALLICK Sannibh | V D V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 27 | ARUN Viyaan | V D V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 28 | RISMAN Edward | D V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 29 | PETROSYAN Aleksander | D V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 30 | MIDDELBEEK Maarten | V V V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 31 | LEE Augustine | D V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 32 | HEILMANN Christian | D D V D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 33 | LLOYD Max | V V D V V V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 34 | ZHANG Howard | V V V V D V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 35 | O'KEEFE Brody | V D V V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 36 | GOLDSTEIN Malcolm | V D V V D V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 37 | BARAKH Adam | V V D D V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 38 | THEETHIRA Kevin-Cariappa | V D V D V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 39 | TERENTIEV Michael | V V V D V D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 40 | WANG Russell | V V D V V D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 41 | VITALE NIKO | V D V V D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 42 | GHIM Ethan | V D D V V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 43 | LI Anton | D V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 44 | SABINO Bennett | D D V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 45 | HEILMANN Caleb | V V D D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 46 | SOLEJ miles | V D D V D V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 47 | BROOKS Grant | V D V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 48 | HUANG KIMBALL | D V V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 49 | LI Felix | V D V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 50 | LEIGH Anthony | D V D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 51 | BORNHOLZ Lawrence | V D V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 52 | LEVY Rafa | D D D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 52 | LI FangKe | V D D D V D | V D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
| 54 | HO Alexander | D V D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 55 | YU Dylan | D D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 56 | VINCENT Yian | D V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 57 | YUE Wesley | V V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 58 | RAJMOHAN Syon | D D V D V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 59 | DIORIO James | V D D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 60 | FIGUS Fabio | D D D D V V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 61 | KARRI Anish | D D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 62 | TIAN Michael | D D D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 63 | TIAN Alex | D V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 64 | FRANTZ Ken | D D D D D D | V D | 3.4 | 0 | -3.4 |
| 65 | ZHANG Leon | D V D V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 66 | ZHANG Mark | V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 67 | CONSTANTINE Leonidas | V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 68 | BELTRAN-PRATS Enzo | D V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 68 | TANG Nicholas | D D D V V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 70 | XIAO August | V D D V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 71 | MALM Gabriel | D V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 72 | COBEY James | D D V D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 73 | LIUZHANG Ben | D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 74 | MULCAHEY Kieran | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 75 | JOHN Christian | V D D D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 76 | KWON Joon | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 77 | GENTELA Pradyumna | V D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 77 | GUO Joe | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 79 | FERNAINE Thomas | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 80 | KNOBEL Benjamin | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 81 | BORROK Andrew | D D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 82 | KISHORE Rishaan | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 83 | WONG Jacob | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 84 | PALERMO Evan | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 85 | PRENDINGUE Michael | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 86 | RUBINSHTEYN Leib | D D D D D D | D | 3.5 | 0 | -3.5 |
| 87 | YAN Kaysen | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 88 | BUCKLEY Charlie | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 88 | IP Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.