Maplewood, NJ - Maplewood, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SHVARTSMAN Rochelle | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 2 | HILADO Sarah | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | YANG Kaitlyn H. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 3 | HOFFMAN Ilsa L. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 5 | SATHYANATH Kailing | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 6 | CHEN Erica | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 8 | YURT Leyla | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 9 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | D V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 10 | SHOMAN Miriam | V D V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 11 | BOIS Adele | V V D D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 12 | SCHMITT Alana P. | V D V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 13 | LEVITIS Danielle | V V V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | KUZNETSOVA Nastassja | D D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 15 | DARINGA Arianna | D D V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 16 | RHIE Lena | D D D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 17 | O'HARA Eimile J. | V V D D V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 18 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | V D D V V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 19 | KRYLOVA Valery | D V V D D V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 20 | FAY Zoe A. | V D D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 21 | HAMMARBERG Shaine Trea | D V D D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | ATLURI Sara V. | D V D V V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 23 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | V D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 24 | BAKER Audrey C. | D V D V D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 25 | JONES Emily | V D D V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 26 | BINSTOCK Mari I. | V D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | BACCHUS-JOSEPH Janine | V V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 28 | LIGH Karis | D D V V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 30 | KOWALSKI Celina | V D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 31 | RODGERS Sally E. | D D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 32 | WHEELER Kira | D D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 33 | YEPEZ Olivia R. | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 34 | FAUSTINO Emily | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.