Event Results
PFA Spring OpenDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WONG Chloe | V V V V V V | V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 2 | DING Kyen | V V D V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 3 | CHAN Ethan | V V V V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 3 | WHITE CAREY Alberta | V V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 5 | GRIGGS Tucker | V D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 6 | JASPERSON Nolan | V V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 7 | TRIMBLE Jonathan | D V D V V D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 8 | HONG Emory | D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 9 | SYLVAIN Kal El | D V D D V | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 10 | BECKER Valentina | D D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 11 | HONG Loren | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 12 | PEDERSEN Arie | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 13 | ROSAS Nathan | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 14 | HAAKE Rachel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |