Torrance, CA - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | RAJA Arnav | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
2 | KIM Andrew H. | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 43% | 16% |
3 | CHEN Lucas B. | 2% | 14% | 38% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
3 | UEYAMA Ietetsu A. | 1% | 19% | 51% | 27% | 2% | |
5 | LIU David J. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
6 | CHANG Colin S. | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
7 | REYES Xavier M. | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 43% | 18% |
8 | YUN Jaesun | - | - | 1% | 15% | 85% | |
9 | SWORDS Evan F. | 17% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | < 1% |
10 | TANN Justin | - | - | 4% | 28% | 56% | 12% |
11 | LE Hayden | 9% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
12 | ALKIN Isaac | - | 7% | 39% | 50% | 3% | |
13 | WANG Eric Y. | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 62% |
14 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% |
15 | KIM Noah L. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
16 | HO Aiden | 6% | 31% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
17 | LIKER Maxim J. | 27% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
18 | VO Minh Q. | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
18 | QIU Nathan | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% |
20 | AVAKIAN Alec | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 7% |
21 | SONG RYAN | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | - |
22 | DAVIS Oliver | 20% | 52% | 25% | 3% | - | |
23 | REED Samuel J. | 20% | 46% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
24 | CHAN Aidan | 7% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - |
25 | ROBLEDO Everett M. | 12% | 50% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
25 | ERWIN Arlo | 16% | 43% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
27 | LO Andrew T. | 58% | 37% | 5% | - | - | |
28 | ARROYO Santiago | 16% | 40% | 34% | 10% | - | - |
29 | MANOHARA Rajath | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.