Event Results
Tucson OpenDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | RITCHIE Phillip | V V V V | V V V V | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 2 | SNELL James E. | V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 3 | COLLINS Vernon | D D V V | V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 3 | BOYERS Morgan | D V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 5 | FOWLER James A. | V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 6 | ZAROTSKY Ronald | V D V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 7 | SARMIENTO Luke | D D V D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 8 | MANDEL Christian | V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 9 | LAURSEN Logan | V V D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 10 | HILLSTROM Nathan | V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 11 | FOISSET Jacob | D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 12 | VENET Téva | D V D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 13 | WILLIAMS Timothy | D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 14 | KING Charles M. | D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 15 | WOLCOTT Charlie A. | D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |