MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YEN Darren | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
2 | SO Hananiah | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
3 | GILES Jeremy M. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
3 | MORREALE John | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% | |
5 | WOOD Elden S. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
6 | HARRIS Alex K. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
7 | KIM Minwook | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
8 | LIU Kelly | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
9 | QUAN Nicholas | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
10 | NG Jonathan H. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
11 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
12 | SHI Andrew | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
13 | TANG Albert | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
14 | LEVIN Mark A. | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
15 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 22% | 4% |
16 | YEN Preston | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
17 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 25% |
18 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
19 | CHAN Daniel | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
20 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
21 | XU Michael | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
22 | WIND Nicky E. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
23 | REYES Kyle | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
24 | CHEN Leo | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
25 | LIU Vincent S. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
26 | ZHOU Matthew R. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
27 | LEMPERT Levy A. | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
28 | TAKEMARU Leo | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 13% |
29 | MAHONEY Colin M. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
30 | HUANG Ethan F. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
31 | LI Minghan | 6% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | LAU Jeremy Y. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
33 | LIN William | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
34 | TANG Brendan J. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
35 | QIN Alexander | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
36 | MOLINARO Lawrence | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
37 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 16% | 39% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
38 | KEEFE Duncan | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
39 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
40 | WEHLE Paul | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
41 | OLAODE Stephen | 28% | 40% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
42 | HONG Vincent Q. | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
43 | FISK Ethan | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
44 | CLAWSON Amzie | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
45 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
46 | CHAN Alexander S. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.