MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 17% |
2 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
3 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
3 | LU Yi Lin | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
5 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% |
6 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 8% |
7 | CHEN Erica | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
8 | HUANG Sharon | 2% | 28% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
9 | TURNOF Kayla M. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
10 | LEVITIS Danielle | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
11 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
12 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
13 | BLUM Leah I. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% |
14 | KATZ Anat | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
15 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
16 | NEIBART Fiona | 1% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
17 | SCHMITT Alana P. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
18 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 2% |
19 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
20 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 6% |
21 | WU Zoe | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 2% | - |
22 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
23 | RHIE Lena | 1% | 12% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
24 | RODGERS Sally E. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
25 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
26 | GUZMAN Claudia | 2% | 15% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
27 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
28 | SHIH Christina | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
29 | CHIANG Emily | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
30 | DARINGA Arianna | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
31 | PANADIWAL Vedricha | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
32 | LIGH Karis | 36% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | MEIEROVICH Sophie | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
34 | HAMMARBERG Shaine Trea | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
35 | WANG Jianning | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
36 | DANK Dina | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
37 | LAI Sophie M. | 34% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
38 | O'HARA Eimile J. | 7% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
39 | CHU Laura | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
40 | NGUYEN Ella | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
41 | ZENG Ruiqi | 27% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
42 | SHAFFER Eva | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.