Event Results
2026 TCFC April ChallengesDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SCHLIEP Camellia | V V | V V | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 2 | SOTO Lucas | D D | V V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 3 | ROG Jacqueline | V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 3 | MEHL Vincent | V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 5 | CHU Isaac | V D V D | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 6 | LAHR Amelia | V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 7 | STEINMAN Cooper Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | HOBERG Isak | D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 9 | RUBIN Aaron | D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |