Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | - | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% | |
| 2 | KOROL Neta | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 2% |
| 3 | CAO Arianna L. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% |
| 3 | TORRES GUTIERREZ Jimena | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 5 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
| 6 | DUAN Konnie | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 7 | KOROL Dana | - | 3% | 29% | 42% | 22% | 4% | |
| 8 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 9 | KIM Katherine | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
| 10 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 11 | SUH Kailey E. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
| 12 | LEE Isabelle | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 13 | ALTEN Ayaka | - | 3% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 5% | |
| 14 | ZHANG Sylvia | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 15 | VOHRA Anusha | 5% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 16 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | CHO Taylor S. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 18 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 19 | YIN Helen | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 20 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | CUI Melody J. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 22 | LEE Bethanie | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 12% | |
| 23 | YANKOPOULOS Alexis | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 24 | MORALES LEDEZMA Georgina Elizabeth | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
| 25 | FAN Elaine | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 26 | KANG Jiyoon | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | HWANG Jungmin | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 28 | YEH Marissa E. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 29 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | PENTSAKOV Margaret | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | PENG Amber L. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 32 | HSIUNG Samantha | 7% | 43% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | YOUNG Audrey S. | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 35 | HO Katherine | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | RINGACH Galit | 58% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | KUMAR Anmol | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | DANG Elizabeth H. | 12% | 44% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 40 | SAAVEDRA ana | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | OTEYZA Camille | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | CABALU Alaina | 25% | 60% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | WALL Sophia | 25% | 47% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.