Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BOTELLO Natalia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 14% |
2 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
3 | KOZAK Sonja A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | 17% | |
3 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 25% | 3% |
5 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
5 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
7 | DOHERTY Maverick L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | |
8 | KIM Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
9 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% |
10 | ZUO Xiaofan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 24% | 3% | |
11 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
12 | ALCANTAR Aryadna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
13 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
14 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 8% | |
15 | CHAN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% | 8% | |
16 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
17 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 6% |
18 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
19 | XU Ellen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% | |
20 | WU Lanting | 100% | 96% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | |
21 | PLONKA Kaley V. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - |
22 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
23 | HUANG Tina | 100% | 83% | 38% | 6% | - | - | |
24 | MENDIOLA RITCHIE Ingrid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
25 | FU Linqian (Helen) | 100% | 100% | 89% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - |
26 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
26 | GUTMAN Valeria | 100% | 96% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
28 | KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. | 100% | 85% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - |
29 | LIM Isabel K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 38% | 7% | |
30 | FLORES Anita | 100% | 89% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
31 | COLTER Aurora | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
32 | SUN Jialing | 100% | 74% | 25% | 2% | - | - | |
33 | MATSUI Alynne M. | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
34 | COWARD Emily C. | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
35 | WIGGINS Yaanathia | 100% | 98% | 79% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - |
36 | FREY Sarah E. | 100% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
37 | HUANG MADELINE | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
38 | LEI Weixuan (Demi) | 100% | 64% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
39 | SHANNON Sara | 100% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.